> On 19 Jul 2017, at 08:52, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email protected]> wrote: > > This being said, I've read -10, _and_ the diff, and I believe that, as > I said before, the document is OK and can move forward.
Hi Stephane, Many thanks for the review. > >> Before we go and poke the ADs to clear their DISCUSS positions, we >> want to make sure the WG has reviewed Sarah's updates > > I'm surprised by the new sentence in section 5 "it provides the > maximum protection an attacker will allow". Surely, the attacker, if > s·he has the choice, will not allow anything? Yes, but the attacker may not have the ability to disallow all protection, depending on the type attacker and the exact authentication used. This was actually Ekr’s phrase from his review. Sara. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
