On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:40:15PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> wrote a message of 219 lines which said:
> I do not believe that DNSSEC validation is warranted as a mitigation > against an active attacker in the context of an opportunistic > metaquery, I see the point but it seems to me a small detail in a 29-pages document. So, IMHO, it should not cause yet another long delay for a draft that already lingered too much. > But i think the other changes between draft-10 and draft-11 are > unwarranted and should be reverted. There are very few changes and, except the DNSSEC *requirment*, they seem good to me. I agree with Sara "I really do think a description there of the trade-offs of DNSSEC validation are warranted". _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
