On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 08:29:29AM -0500, Brian Haberman <[email protected]> wrote a message of 76 lines which said:
> This message starts a two week WG Last Call on advancing: > > Title : Padding Policy for EDNS(0) > Author : Alexander Mayrhofer > Filename : draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-03.txt Executive summary: OK for me, seems ready. Some remarks, none of them blocking. * I would prefer 4.1 "no padding" and 4.2 "fixed length padding" to be moved to an appendix to emphasize they are mentioned just for completeness, not for actual implementation. * a RFC 7942 Implementation Status section could be cool, quoting <http://edns0-padding.org/implementations/> * there is no mention of RFC 7858. Is padding useful except when the data is encrypted? I don't think so. (Stephen Farrell made a similar remark.) _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
