Hello Sara, I've just submitted -04, addressing your comments as follows:
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:12 PM, Sara Dickinson <[email protected]> wrote: > A minor suggestion is to update the following sentence in the Security > Considerations section so it doesn’t inadvertently sound like advice to only > ever implement a single policy: > > CURRENT: > “Therefore, any implementor of EDNS(0) Padding must carefully consider the > chosen > policy and its parameters.” > > PROPOSED: > “Therefore, any implementor of EDNS(0) Padding must carefully consider which > policies to implement, the default policy chosen, which parameters to make > configurable, > and the default parameter values.” thanks - changed. > Also, I’m not sure it needs it because the document is short, but an > ‘at-a-glance’ table comparing the policies which includes the recommendations > might be useful. I've decided not to, particularly since we've now moved two of the strategies to an Appendix. I think there's few enough to grasp the viable options now.. best, Alex _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
