> On Apr 6, 2018, at 3:28 PM, Ian Maddison <email@example.com> wrote: > I'd be extremely disappointed to see hear of the premature demise of this WG. > As we approach the fifth anniversary of the summer of Snowden, I've the > impression > of a job half one, despite all the commendable efforts of the IETF, this > group, > individuals like Stéphane and the getdns team, etc, etc.
Agreed. > Privacy enabled public recursives such as the very useful quad9.net service > are still relatively slow while the quicker ones from the good folks at > Sinodun suffer from a lack of clients I take it the comparison you’re drawing is to the ones that John and Sara are running at 220.127.116.11/16? If so, I’m not sure it’s useful to compare two servers in one location to 800 servers in 180 locations, but if you’re seeing poor performance from any Quad9 node, please open a bug report with a traceroute, so one of our folks can see what’s wrong and get it fixed. > I see a lot of effort going into outreach but it still still seems like the > general public and journalists have yet to catch on to the scale and breadth > of this DNS problem Agreed. -Bill
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy