Hi Paul,

On 12/5/18 12:23 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, Brian Haberman wrote:
> 
>> While MLS is still in its infancy, it is designed for many-to-many
>> communications. That may be beneficial when we are talking about
>> authoritative servers using anycast.
> 
> MLS is about authenticated (group) chat. In this case, the is a big
> need for the querier to remain anonymous and not to present any
> identity. MLS would be an extremely poor fit and bring in a number
> of other concerns, such as depencies on registration services,
> authentication services, etc. etc.

That's a good point that I hadn't considered.

> 
> It's the wrong hammer for DNs privacy

Thanks for the quick response on MLS.

Regards,
Brian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to