On Wed, 13 Mar 2019, Kenji Baheux wrote:
I'm involved with Chrome's DoH efforts.
Our motivations in pursuing DoH in Chrome is to offer our users a better user
experience:
Hopefully, some performance wins.
Tentative plans:
We are considering a first milestone where Chrome would do an automatic
upgrade to DoH when a user’s existing resolver is capable of it.
I'm confused how these two can both be done? You either prefer the local
ISP over Google DNS, or you prefer the faster of the two.
There are some unanswered questions about how we will be doing that
discovery, and would welcome input from the community. Perhaps, a good topic
for IETF 104.
that is interesting indeed. You doing some static name lookups to test
would just make those names be in cache and not a good probe. And
probing nonsense is something that you do too much of already and it
is causing too much root zone noise :P
PS: I won't be able to join IETF 104 to discuss this face to face
I'm already envious :)
Paul
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
