Kenji Baheux wrote: > Discovery is an open question. you ideas would certainly be appreciated for the current work on DoH discovery mechanisms in the DoH WG:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-doh-resolver-associated-doh/ > Until there is a better discovery story, we could have a list of > known-to-be-DoH-compatible DNS providers that we could check against and > map accordingly. Obviously, this doesn't scale but it seems reasonable for > the experimentation phase (gathering data, etc). Are you planning to have a submission website for resolver operators like you do have [1] for HSTS website operators? [1] https://hstspreload.org/ Authentication/verification of the submission could take place via the .well-known endpoint proposed in doh-resolver-associated-doh or a similar mechanism. kind regards, nusenu -- https://twitter.com/nusenu_ https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
