Hi Ben and Hugo, I wanted to follow up and see if my response to Paul satisfies your concerns regarding ADoT being a new unspecified protocol?
To be clear, we argue that ADoT is NOT a new protocol. ADoT is simply DoT with a prepended A to disambiguate the path taken. Regards, Karl >Hi Paul, > >To further clarify, we are not suggesting a change to the DoT protocol and are >making liberal use of the final sentence in the Abstract of RFC7858 and echoed >in the Introduction of RFC8310: "It does not prevent future applications of >the protocol to recursive-to-authoritative traffic." > >Regards, >Karl
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
