Hiya, I'm not who you asked but...
On 20/08/2019 14:38, Henderson, Karl wrote: > To be clear, we argue that ADoT is NOT a new protocol. ADoT is simply > DoT with a prepended A to disambiguate the path taken. Doesn't the need to figure out if an authoritative server does/doesn't do DoT before sending a query require something new that isn't in DoT and that must be part of ADoT? If so, ISTM that there is a new protocol spec of some sort needed even if 90% of the meat of that is the reference to DoT. (I guess maybe if the answer for discovery was "does it listen on 853" you could argue that's not new but I didn't think the WG had figured that out yet.) Cheers, S.
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
