Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Re: ADoT requirements for authentication?

Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:13:09 -0700 


> On 30 Oct 2019, at 18:40, Livingood, Jason <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> I agree that this is not a technical issue of scaling the root; that quantity 
> of queries per day and second is not a big problem. Rather, as you note, it 
> is a layer-9 issue. But I don't think we should constrain our requirements 
> development & protocol design because of this. 

In principle, I agree with you. Though in practice, I'm questioning if it makes 
sense to work on ADoT unless there's a strong likelihood it will get mainstream 
deployment and adoption. [What's the point of producing something that won't 
see widespread use?] And surely if there's going to be ongoing protocol design 
work, that needs to take account of the concerns of those who run busy 
authoritative servers? AFAICT apart from a recent ID from Verisign, they have 
not been part of the discussion so far.

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy


























					Reply via email to