On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:41 PM Brian Dickson <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 4:12 PM John Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In article <
>> cahbrmsdwdotqn8y5zk7rsvepjwwyateyaa6f0oj9desmafh...@mail.gmail.com
>> <cahbrmsdwdotqn8y5zk7rsvepjwwyateyaa6f0oj9desmafh...@mail..gmail.com>>
>> you write:
>> >The ideas floated here about ADoT to the root are not, in my view, about
>> >privacy (directly).  They're about using ADoT to protect the integrity of
>> >(currently) unsigned data in the root zone.
>> >
>> >An alternative solution is to get ADoT bootstrap info from the child
>> zone,
>> >where it could be signed, before making a query that reveals the next
>> >label.  This could work, but at the cost of an extra roundtrip.  (How
>> often
>> >this latency penalty applies depends on the details of the
>> construction..)
>>
>> Thinking about it a little more, I think it is likely that there will
>> be islands of ADoT sort of like there used to be islands of DNSSEC.
>> For example, I expect the people on this list are likely to deploy
>> ADoT long before some of the 2LD's above them. Moreover, all of the
>> problems about getting your DS into the zone above would apply to
>> getting your ADoT signal there.  Even with the cost of an extra lookup
>> it's probably going to work better to have each island describe itself
>> so you don't need an unbroken chain of ADoT from the root.
>>
>
> IMNSHO, ADoT at the leaf + QNAME minimization is all that is required for
> privacy.
> I.e. No need for ADoT anywhere other than at the leaf zone's name server
> (whose NS name might not be in-bailiwick, FYI).
>

Hmm.... I think that's only true if you are assuming that the NS record for
the leaf is DNSSEC secured, but that doesn't seem like a safe assumption.

-Ekr


> Brian
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
>
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to