> On Nov 6, 2019, at 04:24, Ralf Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> 4: without expecting everyone to support DNSSEC. > Really. I can not see how we design something new that does not take DNSSEC > into account.
Indeed. The longer we treat DNSSEC as optional, the longer we will be faced with adoption problems, exactly as with IPv6. We talk a lot about the DNS camel, but the “avoid DNSSEC” camel has quite the number of pages in RFCs now. Paul _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
