On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, at 12:12, Allison Mankin wrote: > Question for the WG: > Would we want to update RFC 7858 (or RFC 8310) to indicate the ALPN ID > exists? This would be for the sake of future implementors, whether they > want to run DoT and DoH, or want to cautiously run only DoT on 443..
Something like this doesn't need to update RFC 7858, any more than RFC 7301 updated RFC 2818 when it defined "http/1.1". It can be a small, standalone document. If there were a reason to reopen RFC 7858 (or 8310), then I would definitely roll the change in, but the fix doesn't need to be very disruptive. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
