If a small RFC is published, as others have discussed, I would support a
statement to the fact that ALPN-capable resolvers SHOULD NOT (MUST NOT?)
require the ALPN identifier when accepting DoT connections on 853.
Ports other than 853 don't impact opportunistic DoT, since you have to have
prior mutual agreement of the alternative port.
Sounds good to me. Tnx.
We really need to figure out how to do DoWhatever discovery,
preferably better than probe ports on the same IP as the port 53
server.
Agreed.
-Jon
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
