> On Jun 10, 2020, at 4:50 PM, Shumon Huque <[email protected]> wrote: >> How does this differ from the two already-competing “oblivious DNS” >> proposals?
> I haven't followed recently. Has a draft been submitted to DPRIVE?
Not to the best of my knowledge, but I am also not following closely. It seems
to be an idea that people are coming up with. Uh, independently inventing.
> Yes, the collusion risk between the ODNS and RDNS operator is a significant
> weakness, although I suspect that might be deemed acceptable for many folks.
It seems to be acceptable for folks who choose to shine the TOR spotlight on
their packets. But that doesn’t make it sufficient for something
newly-engineered.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
