In article <cahpuvduozvecj5jfd6nxyj-crhtjts1n8vcc5pc3uwqeclo...@mail.gmail.com> 
you write:
>Well, the client could just use the zone name as the SNI, no? You can assign
>certificates with the same name but different keys to each of the
>nameservers.

That sounds quite painful for servers that serve hundreds or thousands of zones.

I am assuming these would be self-signed certs. If you want them
signed there's an additional bootstrap problem since the CA everyone
uses, Let's Encrypt, needs working DNS to sign a cert.

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to