On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 09:41:07AM +0100, Sara Dickinson <[email protected]> wrote a message of 61 lines which said:
> This version should address the final comments from the IESG review. Some very small editorial details: Abstract "to assist writers of a Recursive operator Privacy statement" Capital S, for the acronym. Section 1 "These open resolvers have tended" Rather "public resolvers" to be consistent with the rest of the paragraph and with RFC 8499. Section 5.3.1 "Run a copy of the root zone on loopback [RFC7706]" should now be written "Run a local copy of the root zone [RFC8806]". Appendix D.2 "Both POST and GET are supported" Can probably be deleted since RFC 8484 says "DoH servers MUST implement both the POST and GET methods." _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
