On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:32:17PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-07-23 at 12:57 +0100, [email protected] wrote:
> > Are you saying we shouldn't have a list of allowed RR types at all and just
> > limiting to QUERY messages is enough? I asked this question at the last 
> > meeting
> > and the responses were mixed.
> 
> Looking at the list of types, I can't even guess why these types would
> be safe and others would not be. If you're going to have a list, it
> would be good to explain why those types are on it and the rest is not.

You still need an explanation even if there's not a specific list
(vs. just "all types are allowed").  An application profile allowing the
use of TLS 0-RTT data needs to identify which messages are safe to use
with 0-RTT and I'm quite willing to put up a Discuss point if such guidance
is not backed by compelling reasoning.

-Ben

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to