Hi Scott, On 3/23/21 11:26 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>> >From the pure user perspective, do they even know that their "DNS >> server" is an intermediary? > > [SAH] For most people, probably not. > >> What phase 2 requirement can be derived from the above? > > [SAH] There isn't one. This text appears in the Appendix, which (I believe) > helps set the context for the requirements that appear in the sections that > precede it without including additional requirements. If there's an intention > to include requirements in Section 9, it might help to call it something > other than "Appendix", to move it up higher in the document, and to think > about where normative language is needed. My preference is to leave it where > it is, use it to provide background information, and not include normative > language. Sorry, I didn't word my question clearly enough. I agree that there shouldn't be requirements in the appendix. It does serve the purpose of providing context, but does not appear to have a direct link to any requirements that have been documented. So, my question is does this context lead to any specific requirement that should be captured in this document? Regards, Brian _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
