On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 2:44 PM Bill Woodcock <wo...@pch.net> wrote: > > On Mar 31, 2021, at 11:39 PM, Rob Sayre <say...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I think it's fine if you don't want to implement any given IETF RFC. > > Then those RFCs should be worded carefully so that they don’t suggest that > the thing they’re proposing is generally applicable. Particularly to the > roots. Which are actual critical infrastructure. >
I think the IETF as a whole would get consensus on that issue. > > Your business might be different--you know best there. > > Since when are root servers a “business?” > Look, this is just needlessly combative. There are plenty of senses of the word that don't mean what you are implying here. > > We’re talking about critical infrastructure that everyone depends on. Not > some random person’s “business” that can fail or not fail. This isn’t a > place for pointless thrashing around as a byproduct of someone’s unrelated > agenda. Which was, I think, the point of the statement. > Plenty of people come to the IETF from different perspectives. I don't consider DNSSEC to be critical, but I know some people do. That doesn't upset me, or force me to implement it. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
