On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 5:16 AM Sara Dickinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 5 May 2021, at 05:44, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Because this topic relates to TLS usage, I have started an email thread > with the TLS WG for it: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ZIPo1mF_wnOXkgS7Uv_wzIBFmR8/ > > The tentative recommendation so far is in rough agreement with my > instincts, and suggest removing the entire appendix. > > > There was a discussion at IETF108 about using ALPN to distinguish between > XoT and ADoT - the results was the clarification that ALPN should not be > used for that purpose and requests by several people that the document > outline the other mechanisms that could be used by operators (including > SNI, which was mentioned). Appendix A was added in response to those > requests and so removing it entirely at this stage feels like the wrong > thing. > > Obviously if there is text that needs updating/correcting though, that > should be done. > It doesn't seem like the appendix is informative in the sense that someone could read it and make an informed decision. It might be better to link to other documents for the concerns listed (which are valid). thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
