The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8932, "Recommendations for DNS Privacy Service Operators".
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6629 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Joeri de Ruiter <[email protected]> Section: B.1. Original Text ------------- One example would be to replace all TCP/UDP port numbers with one of two fixed values indicating whether the original port was ephemeral (>=1024) or nonephemeral (>1024). Corrected Text -------------- One example would be to replace all TCP/UDP port numbers with one of two fixed values indicating whether the original port was ephemeral (>=1024) or nonephemeral (<1024). Notes ----- Nonephemeral port numbers are <1024 Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8932 (draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-14) -------------------------------------- Title : Recommendations for DNS Privacy Service Operators Publication Date : October 2020 Author(s) : S. Dickinson, B. Overeinder, R. van Rijswijk-Deij, A. Mankin Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE Source : DNS PRIVate Exchange Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
