On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 08:18 -0400, Brian Haberman wrote:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic/
> 
> We would like to hear comments/questions on the applicability of DoQ to
> the three use cases described in the draft:
> 
>    1. Stub to recursive resolver
>    2. Recursive resolver to authoritative servers
>    3. Zone transfers
> 
> Do you agree/disagree that the use cases should be considered for DoQ?

agree

> Do you agree/disagree that DoQ provides sufficient functionality for the
> use cases?

agree

Kind regards,
-- 
Peter van Dijk
PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to