> On 23 Aug 2021, at 20:29, Eric Orth <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> I don't think (1) should get much consideration unless a specific stub
> implementation is found willing and interested in implementing it. For most
> of the clients in this space, I would anticipate that they're either happy
> with DoH or unwilling to add much more complication beyond DoT.
Hi Eric,
To clarify the background here, the implementation section of the draft details
that AdGuard implemented and deployed DoQ (based on the version -02
specification) for (1) in December 2020, open sourcing all the implementations
they used:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-03#page-14
Their blog on this is here: https://adguard.com/en/blog/dns-over-quic.html and
they have presented at various conferences, citing good performance of DoQ in
mobile environments.
Best regards
Sara.
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
