Hi all,During my review, I saw that the id-nits check flagged to down references (RFCs 8094 and 8467). RFC 3967 generally requires that standards track documents not normatively reference documents at a lower maturity level.
My reading of the draft leads me to believe that RFC 8094 (DNS-over-DTLS) does not need to be a normative reference as the text is simply describing which spec is currently associated with UDP port 853. On the other hand, the reference to RFC 8467 (Padding Policy for EDNS(0)) needs to be a normative reference (even though it has a status of Experimental).
RFC 3967 allows for waivers for down references, but they need to be called out during IETF Last Call. My intent is to indicate in the shepherd writeup that RFC 8094 can be moved to an Informative reference, but that a down-ref waiver is being requested for RFC 8467.
Please let me know if you disagree with the above direction.
Regards,
Brian
On 12/1/21 11:35 AM, Brian Haberman wrote:
Thanks, Sara.I will continue with my shepherd review with the goal of advancing this to our AD by early next week.Anyone who made comments who doesn't believe they were adequately addressed, please let me/Tim know.Regards, Brian On 12/1/21 11:05 AM, Sara Dickinson wrote:Hi All,This update address a final few comments we got during WGLC after the bulk of WGLC comments had been addressed in the -06 version:* Add a paragraph to discuss DNS over HTTP/3 vs DoQ * Updated text on middlebox considerations * Clarify use of MessageID 0Note that it retains the text requesting allocation of port 853 (the Early Port Allocation request made last week is still under review).Regards Sara.On 1 Dec 2021, at 16:02, [email protected] wrote:A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.This draft is a work item of the DNS PRIVate Exchange WG of the IETF. Title : DNS over Dedicated QUIC Connections Authors : Christian Huitema Sara Dickinson Allison Mankin Filename : draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-07.txt Pages : 31 Date : 2021-12-01 Abstract: This document describes the use of QUIC to provide transport privacy for DNS. The encryption provided by QUIC has similar properties to that provided by TLS, while QUIC transport eliminates the head-of- line blocking issues inherent with TCP and provides more efficient packet loss recovery than UDP. DNS over QUIC (DoQ) has privacy properties similar to DNS over TLS (DoT) specified in RFC7858, and latency characteristics similar to classic DNS over UDP. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic/ There is also an htmlized version available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-07 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-07 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
