On 07/12/2021 17.52, Brian Haberman wrote:
Please let me know if you disagree with the above direction.
I do not disagree, but in case of 8467 I can also imagine making the normative padding-policy requirements more vague, with a non-normative reference to 8467 as an "example" of (selecting) a good policy.
--Vladimir | knot-resolver.cz _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
