Hi Rob, I’ve learned never to say never in the world of Internet technologies as there are just too many clever people out there who like to some pretty wild hacks, hence the “generally not used”.
-glenn On 1/21/22, 1:33 PM, "Rob Sayre" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 1:15 PM Deen, Glenn <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: 1. Draft Agenda: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2022-add-01/materials/agenda-interim-2022-add-01-add-01-04<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2022-add-01/materials/agenda-interim-2022-add-01-add-01-04__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!Va5Z4xJKiwOStoxU6hxWJyICluCPtHr1vWrv9JGtuSQD7nAh9oR49DQLH6IxGMcXJg$> Hi Glenn, The agenda says: - "DNSSEC is generally not used for the non-global names in Do53 Split DNS environments, so why would it be different for Encrypted DNS?" DNSSEC isn't generally used at all in such an environment, right? thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
