Sure, I meant that DNSSEC is also generally not used for the global names in such an environment.
thanks, Rob On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 13:42 Deen, Glenn <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Rob, > > > > I’ve learned never to say never in the world of Internet technologies as > there are just too many clever people out there who like to some pretty > wild hacks, hence the “generally not used”. > > > > -glenn > > > > On 1/21/22, 1:33 PM, "Rob Sayre" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 1:15 PM Deen, Glenn <Glenn_Deen= > [email protected]> wrote: > > 1. Draft Agenda: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2022-add-01/materials/agenda-interim-2022-add-01-add-01-04 > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2022-add-01/materials/agenda-interim-2022-add-01-add-01-04__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!Va5Z4xJKiwOStoxU6hxWJyICluCPtHr1vWrv9JGtuSQD7nAh9oR49DQLH6IxGMcXJg$> > > > > Hi Glenn, > > > > The agenda says: > > - "DNSSEC is generally not used for the non-global names in Do53 Split > DNS environments, so why would it be different for Encrypted DNS?" > > > > DNSSEC isn't generally used at all in such an environment, right? > > > > thanks, > > Rob > > >
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
