The IETF-wide last call has expired and AFAIK there was only one detailed review by Phillip Hallam-Baker for the security directorate (added in cc): https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/L23bWOxP54NZQPHT7DfRBxZAOCw/
What is the authors/WG plan to address the "has issues" of this review ? You probably know that the cut-off date is Monday 7th of March. As a plain engineer (and without any hat), it appears to me that the Wi-Fi hotspot issue is not limited to DoQ but is also relevant to DoH. And the traffic analysis part is probably addressed already with the padding. With my AD hat, the points about 'outdated' security considerations and privacy vs. confidentiality should be addressed in the document (happy to be corrected of course). Anyway, it would be nice to answer to PHB. Regards -éric -----Original Message----- From: dns-privacy <[email protected]> on behalf of DraftTracker Mail System <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, 23 February 2022 at 09:43 To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Eric Vyncke <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [dns-privacy] Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-09.txt> Please DO NOT reply to this email. I-D: <draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-09.txt> Datatracker URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic/ IETF Last Call has ended, and the state has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
