On Mar 3, 2023, at 9:59 AM, Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > As Brian and I have stated a few times, and Eric our AD has supported, the > plan with this draft is once the authors > are ready is to take it to WGLC, and then park it while we wait for > implementations, and some signs of interoperability > testing. Once we and the working group feel there has been reasonable > progress, we will un-park the document. > > At the time we un-park it to move it to the IESG we can have the discussion > about Standards Track, Experimental, or > Informational. To have that discussion now serves no real purpose (in my > mind). > > The chairs will however hold the document status as something for the WG to > decide on.
We co-authors have just turned in a draft we think is ready for WG Last Call. The draft contains no remaining questions, although of course we're happy to revise it during or after WG Last Call if issues are raised. --Paul Hoffman (also for dkg and Joey) _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
