On 2023-03-28 09:54 +02, Petr Špaček <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27. 03. 23 8:00, Florian Obser wrote: >> At the very least this should be pointed out, e.g. at the end of >> 3. Guidance for Authoritative Servers: >> An authoritative server implementing DoT or DoQ MUST >> authoritatively >> server the same zones over all supported transports. >> This still makes me feel uneasy though. > > TL;DR: From my point of view the text is good as it is. > > I would feel really uneasy in the opposite case, i.e. if the > requirement was dropped. >
This requirement is not spelled out in the draft, hence my suggestion to add a MUST. > Doing probing **per zone** adds lots of state and attempts. Right now > most transport-level state in BIND is currently tied to peer's IP > address (as opposed to [IP, zone] combination) and I don't see > compelling reason to change that. > > -- > Petr Špaček > Internet Systems Consortium > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy > -- In my defence, I have been left unsupervised. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
