On Jun 26, 2023, at 8:20 AM, Brian Haberman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > Tim, Éric, and I have chatted about the next steps for the unilateral > probing draft. Here is the proposed plan for moving the draft forward as > Experimental: > > 1. The authors verify that the implementations listed in Appendix A is > up-to-date. The chairs will request that this list be retained in the > published RFC. > > 2. The authors capture the key metrics submitted to the mailing list for > assessing the experiment in a new appendix. The chairs believe that the below > metrics proposed by Scott Hollenbeck are a good starting point but other WG > participants may have other proposed metrics: > > A. Measurement of CPU and memory use between Do53 and DoT or DoQ. > B. Measurement of query response rates between Do53 and DoT or DoQ. > C. Measurement of server authentication successes and failures. > D. Measurement and descriptions of observed attack traffic, if any. > > 3. The chairs will solicit a volunteer (or volunteers) to collect information > on any interoperability testing that has been carried out between > implementations that support this specification.
That all seems fine with me (not sure about my co-authors, but I'll speak for them unless they yarp about it). > Once the WG is comfortable with the experimentation section and the metrics, > the chairs will submit the draft to the IESG for publication. We will propose > to revisit the status of the document twelve (12) months after publication as > an RFC. > > Any concerns or suggestions on the above plan? Please see the messages I sent to the list over the weekend. Florian has a major concern (responses from encrypting authoritative servers that are also acting as recursive resolvers), and I don't know how to deal with that in the draft because I don't see the differences from non-encrypting authoritative servers that are also acting as recursive resolvers. Beyond that, we have a stack of editorial comments already in the repo, and can put out a new draft with all the current text, then one final one with the results of the steps above. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
