> -----Original Message-----
> From: dns-privacy <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Paul Hoffman
> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 9:40 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [dns-privacy] Key metrics
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click 
> links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
>
> On Jun 26, 2023, at 8:20 AM, Brian Haberman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > 2. The authors capture the key metrics submitted to the mailing list for
> assessing the experiment in a new appendix. The chairs believe that the below
> metrics proposed by Scott Hollenbeck are a good starting point but other WG
> participants may have other proposed metrics:
> >
> >     A. Measurement of CPU and memory use between Do53 and DoT or DoQ.
> >     B. Measurement of query response rates between Do53 and DoT or DoQ.
> >     C. Measurement of server authentication successes and failures.
> >     D. Measurement and descriptions of observed attack traffic, if any.
> >
>
> Are there additional key metrics we should add to the document?

[SAH] Another possibility: Comparison of transactional bandwidth 
(ingress/egress, PPS and BPS) used between Do53 and DoT or DoQ.

Scott

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to