On 30 Jun 2015, at 18:53, Peter Koch <[email protected]> wrote: > This is probably an exception for the lack of a drop catching risk, > but keeping the domain to maintain a stake in the INT domain > might be OK.
That is a remarkably bad idea. The .int domain's supposed to be for international treaty organisations. The NCC is not one. There is no reason why it should "maintain a stake in the INT domain". It simply shouldn't have a stake in this at all. If anything the NCC should be running away from .int as fast as is humanly possible.
