On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:54 AM, /dev/rob0 <r...@gmx.co.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:08:44PM -0400, Alex Xu wrote: >> On 25/03/14 07:03 PM, sven falempin wrote: >> > my concern of nettle vs openssl is the amount of review and >> > testing nettle did get compared to something more widely(!) >> > used >> >> something being used a lot != something being good > > Absolutely true, but in the context of open source software, > especially cryptographic software, more use also tends to mean > more code review. > > I'm not really qualified to judge here what is best; I can only > point out what I, as a user, think about it. I'll trust Simon's > judgment, but I hope he has considered these concerns.
I have not been tracking this conversation closely, but my own take on matters is that I'm opposed to a monoculture of anything... http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-08-29/feature-banana/4922208 And thus I enthusiastically support other OSes than linux, other dns servers besides bind, and other crypto libraries besides openssl. > -- > http://rob0.nodns4.us/ > Offlist GMX mail is seen only if "/dev/rob0" is in the Subject: > > _______________________________________________ > Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list > Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
