On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:19 PM, John Knight <john.kni...@belkin.com> wrote:
> 1) How quick can dnsmasq service a dns request if the address is cached and 
> if the address is not cached?  I am interested in measuring best case 
> performance of doing a dns lookup of an address, as well as determining 
> typical lookup time for cached and non-cached addresses.
> 2) Is there a performance difference if the cache size is increased from 
> default of 150 to 1024 to 2048 to 4096 or more entries?
> 3) If there is a difference in performance when cache size is increased, how 
> is performance degradation characterized?  Is it linear?

google's namebench

_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss

Reply via email to