On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:19 PM, John Knight <john.kni...@belkin.com> wrote: > 1) How quick can dnsmasq service a dns request if the address is cached and > if the address is not cached? I am interested in measuring best case > performance of doing a dns lookup of an address, as well as determining > typical lookup time for cached and non-cached addresses. > 2) Is there a performance difference if the cache size is increased from > default of 150 to 1024 to 2048 to 4096 or more entries? > 3) If there is a difference in performance when cache size is increased, how > is performance degradation characterized? Is it linear?
google's namebench _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss