Hi Simon, Feel free to throw these patches away! Prompted by the recent unused var warning fixes when building on macos, I pondered if the warning suppression was a bit too global. Some warnings are prompted by not including some code (e.g. DHCPV6 vs no DHCPV6) and I wondered if the warning suppression should be made (inverse) conditional. It means that if some future change genuinely ends up with us not using a variable we will get a warning.
Probably done at the same time as the whitespace cleanup, if at all :-) Cheers, Kevin D-B gpg: 012C ACB2 28C6 C53E 9775 9123 B3A2 389B 9DE2 334A
0001-cache.c-tidy-unused-warning.patch
Description: 0001-cache.c-tidy-unused-warning.patch
0002-dhcp-common.c-tidy-unused.patch
Description: 0002-dhcp-common.c-tidy-unused.patch
0003-dhcp.c-tidy-unused.patch
Description: 0003-dhcp.c-tidy-unused.patch
0004-dnsmasq.c-tidy-unused.patch
Description: 0004-dnsmasq.c-tidy-unused.patch
0005-forward.c-tidy-unused.patch
Description: 0005-forward.c-tidy-unused.patch
0006-lease.c-tidy-unused.patch
Description: 0006-lease.c-tidy-unused.patch
0007-network.c-tidy-unused.patch
Description: 0007-network.c-tidy-unused.patch
0008-rfc3315.c-tidy-unused.patch
Description: 0008-rfc3315.c-tidy-unused.patch
_______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
