Re: wrt: draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-00.txt

[Edward Lewis]

At 11:10 AM -0400 8/15/00, Daniel Senie wrote:
>We're talking about a BCP on DNS INADDR, not a BCP about sendmail. I'd
>like to focus the discussion of whether we should or should not publish
>a document on that first. The CONTENT of the BCP, talking about the
>different applications that might run into trouble is another point of
>discussion.

IMHO, the thread is converging on this position:

We want to pursue the document.  Further, the document needs to cover the
technical rationale of why rev-maps are necessary, or are just a good idea,
or are just window dressing.  (Along with addressing other concerns Robert
Elz mentioned.)

If the document justifies the need for rev-map, then this is a BCP.  Else,
it is headed for informational.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                NAI Labs
Phone: +1 443-259-2352                      Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

"It takes years of training to know when to do nothing" - Dogbert

Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.