Re: wrt: draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-00.txt

[Ray Plzak]

I agree with Ed in regards to BCP or Informational.  The justification
needs to be strong in either efficent performance or security.

Ray

On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Edward Lewis wrote:

> Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 11:57:22 -0400
> From: Edward Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Daniel Senie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Lars-Johan Liman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: wrt: draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-00.txt
> 
> 
> If the document justifies the need for rev-map, then this is a BCP.  Else,
> it is headed for informational.
> 
> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Edward Lewis                                                NAI Labs
> Phone: +1 443-259-2352                      Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> "It takes years of training to know when to do nothing" - Dogbert
> 
> Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.
> 
> 
>