> Do you think it would make more sense for the RSSAC to operate, as a body, > a globally distributed set of name servers to which registries could out > source their name server provision? the A in rssac stands for Advisory. it should not operate anything. hell, it has enough problems giving good advice. > One final question. Randy posted a traceroute to ns0.ja.net. i did not mean to ruin your supper. sorry. randy
- placement of secondary name servers for .uk. Peter Gradwell
- Re: placement of secondary name servers for .u... Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: placement of secondary name servers for .u... Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: placement of secondary name servers fo... Randy Bush
- Re: placement of secondary name servers fo... Peter Gradwell
- Re: placement of secondary name server... Randy Bush
- Re: placement of secondary name server... Cricket Liu
- Re: placement of secondary name server... Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: placement of secondary name servers for .u... Harald Alvestrand
