> One final question. Randy posted a traceroute to ns0.ja.net. However, > for .uk. we have ns.uu.net and ns.eu.net, which might be "closer" to > randy (for this example). Which server would Randy prefer to use? > Do resolvers take the "closest?". AFAIK, from reading "DNS & BIND" > it's all rather random. Thoughts? Does this randomness affect the placement > of the servers? No, BIND name servers will tend to use the closest of a set of authoritative name servers, as measured by roundtrip time. (It's in the book.) cricket
- placement of secondary name servers for .uk. Peter Gradwell
- Re: placement of secondary name servers for .u... Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: placement of secondary name servers for .u... Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: placement of secondary name servers fo... Randy Bush
- Re: placement of secondary name servers fo... Peter Gradwell
- Re: placement of secondary name server... Randy Bush
- Re: placement of secondary name server... Cricket Liu
- Re: placement of secondary name server... Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: placement of secondary name servers for .u... Harald Alvestrand
