On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 02:43:35PM +0200, Mans Nilsson wrote: > Well written. They lose. SE does this, same method. After initial > confusion, most people running DNS agree that it is a Good Thing to > do. Some people don't. Running the risk of being whacked (as usually) And for IE too. An authoritative nameserver is authoritative for a finite set of zones. There is no reason to presume the auth. server's own A RR is in one of the zones it's serving. e.g. ns1.isp.net and ns2.isp.net host isp.net ns3.isp.net and ns4.isp.net host ISPs customers' zones, which would naturally not include the isp.net zone. If you're testing the quality of a delegation, you can only query about the zone you're delegating. I could map out the algorithm the IE delegation checker follows if you're interested. Regards, james -- James Raftery (JBR54) "It's somewhere in the Red Hat district" -- A network engineer's freudian slip when talking about Amsterdam's nightlife at RIPE 38.
- Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Woodcock
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Nathan Jones
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark . Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about it... Mark . Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know abou... Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know ... Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know ... Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know ... Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about it... bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about it... Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know abou... Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know ... Sam Trenholme
