On Wed, 9 May 2001, James Raftery wrote:
> And for IE too. An authoritative nameserver is authoritative for a
> finite set of zones. There is no reason to presume the auth. server's
> own A RR is in one of the zones it's serving.
Right. Now that we've gotten that out of the way, can anyone suggest a
*reliable* test for verifying that a nameserver is responding ( which is
seperate from verifying that a nameserver is authoritatively serving a
given zone )
--
Bruce Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +61-7-3367-0490
Systems Administrator APNIC
- Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Woodcock
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Nathan Jones
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark . Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about it... Mark . Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know abou... Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know ... Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know ... Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know ... Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about it... bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about it... Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know abou... Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know ... Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know ... Mans Nilsson
