On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 09:56:37PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 06:00:34 -0700 (PDT) > From: Bill Manning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > | Then the Internet is doomed. Either evolution or revolution. > > In some places, revolution is all that is possible. The evolutionary > step is just too big to every take. I'm butting in here, but it may be interesting to know that quite a number of the top-100 resolving nameserver installations out there are still running Bind4! I'm doing some research on the big resolvers out there, especially the (non-)randomness of the id field. Some of these people have gone through great lengths to remain at Bind4, even though they run late breaking operating system releases. Regards, bert hubert
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Johan Ihren
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Randy Bush
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Robert Elz
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Robert Elz
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Alain Durand
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Robert Elz
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Robert Elz
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary bert hubert
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary bert hubert
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Dancer Vesperman
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Roy Arends
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary bert hubert
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Roy Arends
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary bert hubert
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Nathan Jones
