On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 10:41:28AM -0700, Bill Manning wrote: > % Some of these people have gone through great lengths to remain at Bind4, > % even though they run late breaking operating system releases. > % > % Regards, > % > % bert hubert > > I'd like to compare numbers. I'm working out the data right now. I'm afraid that it will also lead to several vendor's advisories, I've found some nameservers whose idea of random packet ids consists of predictable large fixed positive increments. I'll release the data 'soon'. Regards, bert
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Robert Elz
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Robert Elz
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Alain Durand
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Robert Elz
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Robert Elz
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary bert hubert
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary bert hubert
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Dancer Vesperman
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Roy Arends
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary bert hubert
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Roy Arends
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary bert hubert
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Nathan Jones
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Nathan Jones
- Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary Johan Ihren
