At 7:28 AM -0800 2002/11/04, Randy Bush wrote:
Again, I'd like to see evidence of this. I can verify practices at a few large ISPs, and see if they've been doing it or not. Certainly, the large ISPs I am personally familiar with would never consider doing this -- indeed, the concept almost certainly would not even occur to them.when it is a dns problem, their dns folk. do remember that this happens today and has been happening for many years. isps have been using anycast dns for many years.
If they have been doing this sort of thing, then there is a much, much more serious problem that I think we need to deal with.
Note that I'm talking about true anycast, not route hijacking or transparent proxying.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w---
O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
