We have no responsibility to do reverse. Its an optional part of RFC 1034.
Then stop doing it, please! All I ask is that you don't try to stop others from doing it, if they so choose.
You seem to be depending far too much on reverse, and demonstrating the harms of reverse.
I will repeat, I do not depend on it at all. However, there are others that have demonstrated that they have real applications which make valid use of it, and they are unable or unwilling to stand up for themselves.
Either that, or they're perfectly willing to let me stand up and take the pot-shots from the likes of you, something which I am perfectly happy doing.
-- Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++) #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
