On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 11:56:10PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H?(B wrote:[...] > For example, the address to name mapping for traceroute can be > provided by ICMP node information messages (of course, it depends on > whether intermediate routers support and allow the ICMP, and reply a > useful node name. But similar arguments apply to DNS reverse mapping > as well.)
IPV4 reverse mapping is currently deployed, and therefore provides a functioning operational/software model for IPV6 node identification. Any scenario involving deployment of a new mechanism necessarily creates a substantial extra burden, in a number of areas. Kent #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
