--On Wednesday, March 26, 2003 15:51:28 -0500 Daniel Senie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Order, as in: their broadband provider has a clue? Let's face it, there > are lots of folks who don't have control over this. So if you claim this > check isn't being done for security reasons, then it merely smacks of > elitism. No, for order reasons. It might be a feature that the end-user cannot update the reverse. It tells me things about the hosts that try to connect. Things I may choose to disregard or not. But I want them. > I am glad there's so much discussion of INADDR. I was unable to get much > discussion of it in the last few years in working on > draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-xx with the intention of publishing as a > BCP indicating best practices in this area. I'll revive this, either as > an individual submission or WG item, if folks will actually provide > constructive input. I wholeheartedly support this draft. Please do resubmit or hand the token over if you do not want to yourself. -- M�ns Nilsson Systems Specialist +46 70 681 7204 KTHNOC MN1334-RIPE We're sysadmins. To us, data is a protocol-overhead.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
